Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham: Ignore Our Text Messages


After delaying for a day, Fox News hosts Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham lastly addressed the textual content messages they despatched to Donald Trump’s chief of employees, Mark Meadows, on January 6 imploring the then president to cease his supporters from rioting. The texts, launched on Monday by the House Select Committee investigating the Capitol rebellion, confirmed Hannity asking if Trump would “make a statement” requesting that “people…leave the Capitol” and Ingraham stating that “the president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home. This is hurting all of us. He is destroying his legacy.” Their non-public requests differed wildly from their public remarks later that day, through which they claimed that leftist “antifa” agitators have been a part of the supply of the violence. 

Hannity did acknowledge his texts to Meadows Tuesday evening, however he spent portion of his section lashing out on the “corrupt” House panel for publishing the texts and “smearing” Trump. “I am an honest, straightforward person. I say the same thing in private that I say to all of you. Liz Cheney knows this. She doesn’t seem to care. She’s interested in one thing and one thing only—smearing Trump and purging him from the Party,” said Hannity, who later expressed outrage over his “private text messages being released again publicly. Do we believe in privacy in this country? Apparently not.”

To debate his personal media scandal, Hannity brought in the opposing forces of Dan Bongino and Geraldo Rivera. “I beg you, Sean, to remember the frame of mind you were in when you wrote that text on January 6,” stated Rivera, who described the riot as being “unleashed, incited, and inspired by the president of the United States.” In response, Bongino accused Rivera of “backstabbing” Trump in a “disgusting” method, including, “It’s really vile that you pretend to be this guy’s friend.” Hannity additionally claimed that the textual content messages he despatched to Meadows matched what he “was saying live on the radio at that time and on TV that night on January 6.” In actuality, Hannity didn’t point out that Trump had the affect to dissuade his supporters, as an alternative utilizing his airtime on January 6 to allege that teams “like antifa…were there to cause trouble.”

For her half, Ingraham insisted yesterday that her behind-the-scenes messages to Meadows have been according to her real-time protection of January 6, whereas slamming “left-wing media hacks” for accusing her of hypocrisy. “Both publicly and privately, I said what I believe: that the breach of the Capitol on January 6 was a terrible thing. Crimes were committed,” Ingraham said. “Some people were unfairly hounded and persecuted…but it was not an insurrection. To say anything different is beyond dishonest, and it ignores the facts of that day.” Like Hannity, nonetheless, Ingraham reported on January 6 that “antifa sympathizers may have been sprinkled throughout the crowd” and stated that the rioters “were likely not all Trump supporters.”

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair       

— Why Gutting Abortion Rights Could Damage SCOTUS’s Own Legitimacy
Jared and Ivanka Try Slithering Back to Polite Society
— A Potential East Hampton Airport Closure Ignites Class Warfare
— A $2.5 Billion Plan to Thwart COVID Variants Is Stalled Inside the Biden Administration
— Mark Meadows, Who Knows Where Trump’s Bodies Are Buried, Is Cooperating
Meet the Lawyers Trying to Set Ghislaine Maxwell Free
— Did Twitter’s Jack Dorsey Quit—Or Was He Fired?
Trump’s Capacity to Steal the 2024 Election Is Only Growing
— From the Archive: Twitter’s Constant State of Turmoil
— Not a subscriber? Join Vanity Fair to obtain full entry to and the whole on-line archive now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post