The Webb Telescope’s Latest Stumbling Block: Its Name

0 Comments




Sean O’Keefe, the NASA administrator who named the telescope in 2002, stated in an e mail that Webb was “a champion of education, technology, science, aeronautics and human exploration.”

“Arguably, were it not for James Webb’s determination to fulfill the most audacious vision of his time, our capacity to explore today would be starkly different,” Mr. O’Keefe stated. “He introduced complex systems management — a discipline to harness the exceptional technical capability of NASA at that time.” Mr. O’Keefe added that he was unaware of any proof that Webb was chargeable for the Lavender Scare.

In May, NASA promised a full investigation by its performing chief historian, Brian Odom. On Sept. 27, the company issued an announcement from the present NASA administrator, Bill Nelson, saying, “We have found no evidence at this time that warrants changing the name of the James Webb Space Telescope.” Since then, no in depth report has been forthcoming.

This has infuriated many astronomers, and a few 1,200 have signed a petition calling for the telescope to be renamed. “Under Webb’s leadership, queer people were persecuted,” the petition reads, partially. “Those who would excuse Webb’s failure of leadership cannot simultaneously award him credit for his management of Apollo.”

On listening to Mr. Nelson’s announcement, Dr. Walkowicz abruptly resigned their publish on the NASA Astrophysics Advisory Committee. “This flippant, pathetic response to the very reasonable questions raised by the astronomical community regarding JWST’s name sends a clear message of NASA’s position on the rights of queer astronomers,” they wrote in a web-based assertion. “It also speaks clearly to me that NASA does not deserve my time.”

In an e mail, Dr. Prescod-Weinstein stated she was pissed off on the lack of promised transparency. Moreover, she stated, the declare of “no evidence” was too robust, because it instructed that Webb was not chargeable for the homophobia — well-documented — that his crew promulgated throughout his tenure at NASA.

“If he’s not responsible for the bad stuff that happened while he was in charge, why is he responsible for the good stuff?” Dr. Prescod-Weinstein stated. “It seems there’s a bit of double-think happening here, where people assign him responsibility for the things they like about his legacy and pretend that he’s only responsible for the things they like.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post