What Congress wants from NFL regarding WFT, Jon Gruden investigation, explained

0 Comments





Try as it would, the NFL can not seem to tamp down requests for the total outcomes of an investigation into the Washington Football Team that in the end revealed racist, sexist and misogynistic emails from former Raiders coach Jon Gruden and led to his resignation.

There have been requests from journalists, former WFT employees, the NFLPA executive director and, on Thursday, the United States House of Representatives for the league to launch the findings.

Up to now, the league has remained steadfast in its place that it won’t release anything else related to the probe. The league has additionally said that no other current team personnel have been implicated or discovered to have dedicated any wrongdoing.

MORE: Jon Gruden’s emails, explained

That wasn’t sufficient for Congress. The House Committee on Oversight and Reform is launching its personal investigation into the NFL’s dealing with of the matter.

Here’s what we all know:

What is the House Oversight and Reform Committee investigating?

The Oversight Committee is the primary investigative physique of the House and has broad latitude by way of what it investigates.

The Committee on Oversight and Reform is the primary investigative committee within the U.S. House of Representatives. It has authority to research the themes inside the Committee’s legislative jurisdiction in addition to “any matter” inside the jurisdiction of the opposite standing House Committees.

In this case, the committee will look into “the Washington Football Team’s (WFT) hostile workplace culture and NFL’s handling of this matter.” The full assertion might be read here. Also in query is the authority and independence with which former federal prosecutor Beth Wilkinson, who was retained by crew president Daniel Snyder to supervise the investigation, operated.

MORE: Gruden admits to insulting Goodell in emails

The committee can be trying into “the NFL’s lack of transparency about the problems it recently uncovered,” which it says “raise questions about the seriousness with which it has addressed bigotry, racism, sexism, and homophobia — setting troubling precedent for other workplaces.” That is an obvious reference to the Gruden emails. 

What is the committee requesting?

The committee, which is chaired by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., is asking the NFL for all paperwork and knowledge associated to the investigation of the WFT.

The committee is requesting three units of paperwork and wants eight questions answered.

MORE: Patrick Mahomes’ brother apologizes for dancing on Sean Taylor’s number during jersey retirement ceremony

The paperwork:

  1. All paperwork and communications obtained in reference to the investigation into the WFT, its administration, its house owners, and every other matter referring to or ensuing from the WFT investigation;
  2. All stories or findings made in reference to investigations into the WFT, together with however not restricted to semi-annual stories from the WFT, and all paperwork and notes referring or referring to any oral stories and findings; and
  3. All NFL insurance policies and procedures referring or referring to the usage of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements by the NFL and its groups.

 The questions:

  1. What causes did the WFT present for requesting that the NFL assume “full oversight” over Ms. Wilkinson’s investigation, and why did the NFL comply with assume this function?
  2. Please describe intimately the NFL’s function in overseeing Ms. Wilkinson’s investigation, and what modifications, if any, have been carried out because of the NFL’s function.
  3. Please describe intimately Mr. Pash’s function within the investigations described on this letter, if any.
  4. Please present an inventory of all NFL staff who have been concerned in overseeing Ms. Wilkinson’s investigation, together with their names and job titles, and describe intimately every of their roles
  5. How typically did the NFL talk with Ms. Wilkinson or members of her crew throughout the investigation, and the way did these communications happen (e.g., by cellphone, e-mail, or in particular person)?
  6. Who directed Ms. Wilkinson to supply the NFL oral stories and investigative findings, relatively than written stories and investigative findings, and why? Please present an inventory of all conferences or briefings at which Ms. Wilkinson or any member of her crew supplied closing or preliminary findings, interim stories, or read-outs to the NFL, the dates that they occurred, and all contributors.
  7. Please affirm the variety of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements reported to the NFL, or entered into by the NFL, from January 1, 2016, via the current, together with the names of the groups concerned, dates of the agreements, and whether or not the agreements resulted from allegations of discrimination and retaliation.
  8. What actions has the NFL taken, if any, regarding the usage of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements in issues associated to office abuses since January 1, 2016?

“Pash” refers to Jeff Pash, the NFL’s normal counsel. He, too, has drawn scrutiny in latest weeks over his friendly relationship with former WFT president Bruce Allen and emails the 2 exchanged on myriad matters.

Most notably, Pash and Allen mentioned a perceived bias the league has in opposition to hiring conservatives, and Pash informed Allen his try to chop a participant’s wage was “the Lord’s work.” The NFL got here to Pash’s protection over the emails, whereas the NFLPA described them as “absolutely concerning.”

The House committee gave the NFL till Nov. 4 to provide the requested paperwork and solutions to the questions. The full letter might be read here.

Will the NFL adjust to the committee’s request?

According to CBS Sports, NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy confirmed the league was in receipt of the committee’s letter and conscious of its requests. He declined to say whether or not the NFL would provide Congress with the knowledge it requested for.

“We have received the Chairwoman’s letter and share her concern that all workplaces should be free from any form of harassment and discrimination,” McCarthy mentioned. “We look forward to speaking to her office soon.”

MORE: Gruden, WFT only ones to warrant NFL action in email probe

The league has remained constant that it will not launch something extra, although that was earlier than Congress got here knocking. 

According to committee Rule 14, which offers with supplying paperwork, if the NFL cannot absolutely meet the Nov. 4 deadline, it wants to supply a purpose as to why and wishes to supply no matter it could actually by that date.

“If compliance with the request cannot be made in full by the specified return date, compliance shall be made to the extent possible by that date. An explanation of why full compliance is not possible shall be provided along with any partial production,” the rule reads.

The commitee set a Nov. 4 deadline for the league to submit all of the supplies, which supplies the NFL 15 days to conform or clarify why it couldn’t.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post